data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/71710/7171018af5e4e4dc28e8b63701e19fc0a7c88d07" alt="Cargo Container Lot"
Azure Table Storage and Cosmos DB are two popular NoSQL databases offered by Microsoft Azure. Azure Table Storage is a key-value store that's well-suited for large amounts of structured or semi-structured data.
Cosmos DB, on the other hand, is a globally distributed, multi-model database that supports document, key-value, and graph data models. It's designed to handle high traffic and provide low latency.
The choice between Azure Table Storage and Cosmos DB depends on your specific use case and requirements. If you need to store large amounts of structured data, Azure Table Storage might be the way to go.
Azure Table Storage vs Cosmos DB
Azure Table Storage is a cost-effective solution for storing structured data, offering a straightforward data model and exceptional availability and durability. It's perfect for scenarios that require efficient storage and retrieval of structured data, such as logging, user profiles, and IoT telemetry.
Azure Cosmos DB, on the other hand, is a globally distributed, multi-model database service that delivers high-performance and scalable storage. It accommodates multiple data models, including document, key-value, graph, and columnar, making it suitable for applications with demanding performance and scalability prerequisites.
Here's a comparison of the two services:
Ultimately, the choice between Azure Table Storage and Azure Cosmos DB depends on your specific application requirements. If you have structured data and need a simple and cost-effective storage solution, Azure Table Storage is a viable option.
What is Azure Table Storage
Azure Table Storage is a NoSQL key-value store that allows you to store large amounts of structured data in the cloud.
It's designed to handle massive amounts of data and can scale to meet the needs of your application.
Azure Table Storage uses a schema-less design, meaning you don't need to define a fixed schema for your data before storing it.
This makes it easy to add or remove properties from your data without having to worry about the underlying structure.
You can store up to 100 TB of data in a single table, and each table can contain up to 255 properties per entity.
Azure Table Storage also supports partitioning, which allows you to divide your data into smaller, more manageable pieces for easier querying and maintenance.
Azure Table Storage is a good choice when you need to store large amounts of structured data and don't need the advanced features of Cosmos DB.
Cosmos DB vs Azure Table Storage
Cosmos DB is a globally distributed, multi-model database service that offers high-performance and scalable storage, making it ideal for applications with demanding performance and scalability prerequisites.
One key difference between Cosmos DB and Azure Table Storage is that Cosmos DB has guaranteed low-latency access, with a read latency below 10 milliseconds and a write latency below 15 milliseconds, whereas Azure Table Storage doesn't make any latency promises in its SLA.
Cosmos DB also offers multiple consistency levels, including strong, bounded staleness, session, consistent prefix, and eventual, providing flexibility to balance between consistency, availability, and performance based on application needs.
Azure Table Storage, on the other hand, is a cost-effective solution for storing vast amounts of data with exceptional availability and durability, making it perfect for scenarios that necessitate efficient storage and retrieval of structured data.
Here's a comparison of the two services:
Cosmos DB is designed for geographic performance and availability, allowing you to create writable nodes all over the world, making your application fast and available everywhere.
Azure Table Storage, while simple and cost-effective, may not be the best choice for applications that require advanced querying capabilities, global scalability, and support for multiple data models.
Ultimately, the choice between Cosmos DB and Azure Table Storage depends on your specific application requirements, and understanding their differences will help you make an informed decision.
Key Features
Azure Table Storage and Azure Cosmos DB for Table are two powerful storage options, but they have distinct features that set them apart. Azure Table Storage is designed for simple key-value storage and high transaction volume, making it a cost-effective choice.
Azure Table Storage offers strong and eventual consistency levels, with an availability of 99.9%. This means that your data will be highly available, but you may experience occasional inconsistencies.
For more complex use cases, Azure Cosmos DB for Table shines with its multiple NoSQL models, automatic indexing, and advanced security features. It also offers a range of consistency levels, including strong, bounded staleness, session, consistent prefix, and eventual.
Here's a comparison of the two services in terms of their key features:
In terms of data modeling, it's essential to plan carefully and identify access patterns and query requirements. Denormalizing your data can minimize the need for joins and improve query performance, while using composite keys effectively can optimize data retrieval.
Account
To use Azure Table storage, you need to create a storage account and obtain the necessary credentials for authentication. This storage account serves as the top-level container for your Azure Table storage resources, providing a unique namespace for your tables and entities.
A storage account is a crucial step in setting up Azure Table storage, and it's essential to understand its role in the process.
Cosmos DB
Cosmos DB is a globally distributed, multi-model database service that offers high-performance and scalable storage. It's designed for applications with demanding performance and scalability prerequisites, making it a great choice for complex, globally distributed systems.
Cosmos DB supports multiple data models, including document, key-value, graph, and columnar, allowing you to choose the most fitting model for your data. This flexibility is a major advantage over Azure Table Storage, which is limited to a key-value store.
Here are some key benefits of Cosmos DB:
Overall, Cosmos DB is a powerful and flexible storage solution that's well-suited for applications with complex data relationships and high scalability requirements.
What is Cosmos DB
Cosmos DB is a service that offers a more versatile and scalable option compared to Azure Table Storage. It's part of the Azure Cosmos DB service, which supports multiple NoSQL models.
This makes it suitable for complex data relationships and queries. Cosmos DB Tables provide multiple consistency levels, including strong, bounded staleness, session, consistent prefix, and eventual.
It's globally distributed, offering high availability with low latency through multi-region replication.
Semi-Structured
Semi-structured data is a flexible format that allows for the storage of data without a predefined table schema. This makes it ideal for storing massive amounts of information.
Azure Table Storage is a great way to store semi-structured data, and it's fast and highly available. Azure Cosmos DB also offers table storage through its Table API.
Azure Table Storage and Azure Cosmos DB Table API are very similar, so it's worth considering which one to use and when. Azure Table Storage and Azure Cosmos DB Table API are so similar that you can use the same API to access both.
Semi-structured data sits between relational data and unstructured data, providing a flexible schema that's perfect for specific use cases. It's a great choice for applications that need to store data without a predefined table schema.
Sources
- https://microsoft.github.io/AzureTipsAndTricks/blog/tip360.html
- https://db-engines.com/en/system/Microsoft+Azure+Cosmos+DB%3BMicrosoft+Azure+Table+Storage
- https://cloudkeeda.com/azure-table-storage/
- https://cerebrata.com/blog/comparison-between-azure-storage-v1-vs-v2
- https://build5nines.com/how-to-choose-between-azure-cosmos-db-for-table-and-azure-table-storage/
Featured Images: pexels.com